Hi Jon, Am 22.07.2011 um 13:38 schrieb Jonathan Craig: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> The only viable solution is to fix that and to force a unique soname. >> This is what we have done on libnet1. > > Are there side effects to this solution. Obviously anything we built > against our modified library would fail to find its shared library if > someone removed ours and compiled their own.
Probably yet, but I would say if someone replaces one of our libs they should better know what they are doing. > How about end users > compiling against ours? Any issues with their ability to choose > library version or anything like that? They should always use the new one. The layout is described here: http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-libnet Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
