2011/9/3 Ben Walton <[email protected]>: > Excerpts from Maciej Bliziński's message of Sat Sep 03 12:06:33 -0400 2011: > > Hi Maciej, > >> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/wiki/GarCodingStyle > >> Should we update the coding guideline to reflect this, or do we need >> more discussion? > > I am in the group that has started lumping package describing things > together although I typically still follow the overall flow of the > described style. I think that if #9 were blended into #3 that it > would fairly closely match my preferred pattern. I'd be happy to > support this (fairly minor, imo) change. > > Do you see larger changes needed to fit what we're seeing in practice?
Nothing larger, your paragraph summarizes it well. I'd move PACKAGES and SPKG_DESC from #3 to #9, and indicate that PACKAGES would use += and have one entry per package. I also thought that we could show an example, an example may be easier to understand than a description. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
