2011/8/28 Ben Walton <[email protected]>: >> I don't have any objection toward its removal. However, is there a >> conflict with the current or future gcc releases? If there is no >> conflict don't remove it. > > I think we need to retain the *rt packages though...either that or > also drop the few things that depend on them. I don't have any > comment on whether or not that is good/bad as I don't use those > packages. In this case, I'd likely err toward leaving the *rt > packages around.
The rt packages need to stay as long as other packages depend on them. I hope that with time we will rebuild or remove dependent packages. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
