what would you suggest to report upstream? On Mar 8, 2012 10:56 AM, "Nicolai Schwindt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2012/3/8 Nicolai Schwindt <[email protected]>: > > > [...] > > >> > > >> -SVNLIB Â Â = $(prefix)/lib/svn > > > > > > This contains the needed lib, actually an old version > > > > > >> +SVNLIB Â Â = $(libdir) > > > > > > This does not. > > > > I don't understand - SVNLIB is a private variable in GAR which is used > > to configure some directory settings. If it were set to something > > else, the subversion build would follow. No other packages install > > anything to /opt/csw/lib/svn, do they? > > The variable gets used to configure : > CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS) --libdir=$(SVNLIB) --libexecdir=$(SVNLIB) > > With SVNLIB=$(prefix)/lib/svn the linker got -L/opt/csw/lib/svn and used > the old > libraries. > > With SVNLIB=$(libdir) the linker gets -L/opt/csw anf fails. > > While staging to DESTIDR you would need : > > > -L/home/maciej/src/opencsw/pkg/subversion/trunk/work/solaris10-sparc/pkgroot/opt > /csw/lib/svn > > Doing this on a machine which does not contain an old version of subversion > would fail for both settings of SVNLIB. > > Subversion seems generally broken - the code and the build. > > > Nicolai > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
