Hi Yann, Am 12.07.2012 um 23:54 schrieb Yann Rouillard: > I have again some spare cycles and I want to use them on the openssl > migration so we don't delay indefinitely the release of the group 1. > So here a quick status update: > > 22 packages are now waiting to be updated or dropped in the group 1, before > we can release the already updated packages. > claws_htmlviewer, claws_mail and libetpan: I didn't have any objection > against the removal of these packages, so I will proceed. > boincclient, boinclibs and boincmanager: Maciej proposed to drop these > packages, I will ping the maintainer about this but I propose to follow this > idea unless the maintainer answers or someone else steps up. > gnucash: Peter, have you been able to made some progress on this package ? > libserf0_0 and xmlrpc_c: Dago noticed that theses packages don't have any > reverse dependancies, I will remove them unless someone objects. > libgnomecups, libgnomeprint, libbonoboui and gnomevfs2: Dago, you began to > work on these libraries. Have you made some progress ? (FYI, I am currently > trying to continue to work on gnomevfs2).
Not yet, and I will also be away until end of next week :-( > icecast: Dago you are the maintainer of this package, do you need some help > to update it ? I have reworked it, but I wanted to fix all open bugs at the same time. I could release a version right now, but the SMF manifest is still missing. > libneon26: Dago proposed to rebuild or drop as only gstplugins_bad depend of > this package. Any objection to the removal of gstplugins_bad ? The problem is that neon_stub (CSWneon) depends on libneon26 and lots of packages still depend on CSWneon, so this requires a rebuild of neon dropping foreign dependency to libneon26. Catalog integrity as a whole should be taken a close look when dropping packages. I think package chains like this are currently not looked by default. > ooocore: I had no answer from James, I will ping him again but I propose to > remove the package from unstable if don't have a quick answer. Anyway, the > package has not been updated since nearly 3 years. > courier_imap: juraj, you stepped up to takeover this package. Have you made > some progress ? > proftpd: I will directly ping the maintainer and I will try to update the > existing recipe and I will upload an updated version of the package even if > the maintainer doesn't answer. > dovecot: I will directly ping the maintainer to see if he can update the > package quickly or if he needs some help. > postfix: as agreed with Juraj, I updated the recipe and compiled the package. > Juraj can you test and release the package ? > hobbit: the package has not been updated for 5 years. I propose to remove > this package from unstable unless someone quickly steps up to takeover the > package. IIRC Jürgen wanted to take a look at this. > libpq: packages depending on libpq should be recompiled with libpq5. This affects the following packages: aide Advanced Intrusion Detection Environment courier_auth Generic authentication API for Courier mail services dovecot Secure IMAP server php5_pdopgsql The pdopgsql extention for PHP5 php5_pgsql The pgsql extention for PHP5 pm_dbdpg I think most of them are already rebuild. Best regards -- Dago > -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
