2012/7/23 Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> > > BTW, openssl 1.0.0 seems definitely not ABI compatible with 0.9.8 > according > > to > > > http://www.upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/openssl/0.9.8x_to_1.0.0/abi_compat_report.html#Symbol_Problems_High > > And you are really sure that this works with Linux? > > Linux should also suffer from the incompatibilities. >
Well I am sure this works with Linux because I did the tests, the example I previously gave about Linux: ( http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2012-July/017068.html ) is a real life example (although I had to recompile packages to re-create the situation). And it doesn't seem Debian had to follow the same painfull process for the transition, because they have used symbol versioning for a long time: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 > It looks like you need to supply both libraries. > Yes I need to, but only one of them is really used at runtime under Solaris and at least one library or binary is linked against the wrong ssl version at runtime. That's the problem I am trying to fix. Yann
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
