you are right. subverison is only for solaris 10, and its fine for serf as well. on unstable10s it gives:
# Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe: # This is a summary; see above for details. # The following lines define a new package: CSWlibserf1-0 PACKAGES += CSWlibserf1-0 CATALOGNAME_CSWlibserf1-0 = libserf1_0 PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0\.0\.0) PKGFILES_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(call baseisadirs,$(libdir),libserf-1\.so\.0(\.\d+)*) SPKG_DESC_CSWlibserf1-0 += $(DESCRIPTION), libserf-1.so.0 RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibserf1-1 += CSWlibserf1-0 # The end of CSWlibserf1-0 definition why checkpkg thinks there should be a reference from 1.1 to 1.0? On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Thu Aug 16 15:18:56 -0400 2012: > >> oh .. it got cut off. unstable9s, unstable9x. > > The ssl 1.0 update was only for solaris 10. I'd suggest abandoning > solaris 9 for this library unless you want to add the dependency based > on a variable and build for both platforms separately. > > That would look something like: > > PACKAGING_PLATFORMS = solaris9-i386 solaris9-sparc solaris10-i386 > solaris10-sparc > > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.9 = CSWlibssl0-9-8 > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_SunOS5.10 = CSWlibssl1-0-0 > > RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS += RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_$(GAROSREL) > > (Not checked, it might need a small tweak.) > > It's up to you whether you go this route or not though. > > Thanks > -Ben > -- > Ben Walton > Systems Programmer - CHASS > University of Toronto > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 > > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
