Hi Peter, Am 21.08.2012 um 19:32 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: > Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >> Am 20.08.2012 um 19:41 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >>> Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >>>> Am 20.08.2012 um 14:35 schrieb [email protected]: >>>>> I started to have issues with the Solaris provided linker some times ago. >>>>> Lately I stumbled again on a different behavior of the public build farm >>>>> and the one that I'm using privately. >>>>> >>>>> On the public build-farm the linker version is: >>>>> >>>>> ld: Software Generation Utilities - Solaris Link Editors: 5.10-1.500 >>>> >>>> On which host are you executing this? I just have update the Sparc 10 >>>> machines to u10. >>> >>> unstable10x and unstable10s; /etc/release doesn't reflect that it's u10… >> >> Umh… >> >> dam@unstable10s [unstable10s]:/home/dam > more /etc/release >> Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10s_u10wos_17b SPARC >> Copyright (c) 1983, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. >> Assembled 23 August 2011 > > Yep, but quite recently, isn't it?
Yes, some weeks ago, I announced the update on maintainers, remember? >>>> Should I do some more patching on x86? >>> >>> I don't see it as a x86 issue. >> >> In fact it is, as I recently patched only the sparc machines and then went >> out of time, so the x86 machines are u9 at most. > > You're right. Do you plan to upgrade the x86 systems also? In fact I have, but the volumes of the VMs are too small and I need to migrate to some bigger LUNs first. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
