Hi Ben, > 1. write a checkpkg test to test if direct binding if properly enabled in > > a package, > > How do you envision this check being implemented? As a positive or > negative check? >
Well I think negative check is a better way to make sure direct binding is enabled in packages ;) Besides it's the way checkpkg works, doesn't it ? Of course, maintainers will be able to override the check (like other checkpkg tests), but at least they will need to do it on purpose. > > 2. enable Direct Binding manually for a reduced set of packages (at > least > > my packages :) ) > > (we just have to pass "-Bdirect" to SUN ld) > > I see you're doing this already! +1 > Want to join me on this so we have a wider packages set ? :) > > 3. wait a bit to see if something unexpected happens :) > > 3. if it works, enable it by globally adding the option to LINKER_FLAGS > > 4. enable the checkpkg direct binding test by default so we can catch > even > > packages that don't use LDFLAGS > > +1. I think it's a sound plan. > Thank you for your feedback ! Yann
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
