"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <[email protected]> writes: > 2012/11/12 Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]>: >> Maciej: How about a slight change in csw-upload-pkg which rejects >> foreign uploads to active maintainers unless the maintainer is >> either retired/sabbatical or --takeover is specified? > > Do we really want that? What's the rationale behind it? On the camp we > talked that it's a good thing if we're not locking down packages to > specific people. Part of that is the change of wording to "Last uploaded by".
If we implement this it should be set on a package basis, i.e. in the recipe such as csw-upload-pkg can comply. > I looked at albumshaper. It is built with GCC 3, so I looked why - it > turns out it depends on KDE. We don't have KDE in the repository any > more, but the old packages are installed on the buildfarm, so the > build runs for now. But when we clean the buildfarm from the packages > that we dropped from the catalog, the build will no longer run as is, > e.g. qmake from KDE will be gone. That means that you remove KDE and possibly gcc3 ? Well, again, what's the rationale? > The good news is that we have CSWqt4-gxx-dev[1] which brings us qmake > from QT4. So I'm guessing that unless albumshaper requires more KDE > components, it could be built with QT4 from /opt/csw/gxx. I'll try. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
