Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Peter, > > Am 18.11.2012 um 15:14 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >> Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >>> Am 15.11.2012 um 16:30 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński >>> <[email protected]>: >>>> 2012/11/15 <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> The package libkpathsea6 is generated on September 27 but the checking >>>>> take place on September 30... >>>>> >>>>> Here is what I got: >>>>> >>>>> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: >>>>> '/home/pfelecan/staging/build-30.Sep.2012/libkpathsea6-20120701,REV=2012.09.27-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' >>>>> gmake[1]: *** [pkgcheck] Error 2 >>>> >>>> ...and the file doesn't exist, right? I blame GAR. checkpkg has to >>>> get the right file name, it's not sane to do in any other way. >>>> >>>> If it takes days for these operations, you can try running checkpkg by >>>> hand. Look what the options are there, against which catalog release, >>>> architecture and OS release you want to check it, and see what >>>> happens. >>>> >>>> Meanwhile, GAR needs to learn how to not re-evaluate file names. >>> >>> For now you can do >>> mgar platforms-repackage >>> to just redo the packaging phase. >> >> Right. However the repackage takes more than 2 days! IMHO we'll have the >> same issue. > > > Are you sure? The repackage phase is usually pretty fast.
The prototypes creation for each package takes between 30 and 240 minutes... I'll provide a list and other statistics the next week. > Nonetheless you are of course right that this is a bug in GAR, unfortunately > it is not > an easy fix so if we can work around this quickly you probably get a > releasable package > much faster than waiting for me to get a full fix for that. Possibly. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
