On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/11/25 Ben Walton <[email protected]> >> I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to omit GAR from the process of >> building CSWcommon? The makefile could override any required targets >> to drive the packing commands directly. It's a simple package without >> much in the way of complexity and is already a bit of a special case. >> We could even just have a script instead of a makefile? > > I talked about this with Dago, and the conclusion was that we're > getting rid of CSWcommon, it's not that useful anyway. I put empty > CSWcommon into bratislava, but it's only so that I could reuse libgcc > from unstable. After I rebuild GCC for bratislava, we're removing the > remnants of CSWcommon.
Ok, that works for me. The only downside that I see here is that catalog analysis would require handling a forest instead of a single tree. For any practical purposes this doesn't matter. So long CSWcommon and thanks for all the fish! Thanks -Ben _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
