On 14-12-12 16:51, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: > We maintained it for backward compatibility. But I think in practice > it confuses people, they think there's a release (or a branch) called > 'current', or that whatever is in there, is up to date. All of that is > not so, and maybe our users are better of without the symlink? I > propose that we delete it, or replace it with a stub like we did with > the 'stable' branch.
"stable" being a mantra for servers and the way to go for releases (e.g. Debian Stable: older, but stable, maintained and secured), the name is really confusing. Similarly, UNIX admins and engineers are not too fond on running things named testing, unstable or experimental on anything besides a personal laptop or a "toy" server. I agree with Maciej. C. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
