Hi, Am 21.02.2013 um 10:24 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <[email protected]>: >> Finally, when I'm writing "luxury" I think to what was suggested by Dag, >> i.e. when using only the "packaging" target on a system which has >> checkpkg activated showing what should be the checkpkg stanza; and this >> is not a luxury but a necessity as we have seen. > > Some GAR code refactoring will be required around line 1015 of > gar.pkg.mk, so that you can either run or display the checkpkg > command, and you still keep all how-to-run-checkpkg information in one place. > > Dago, is it doable?
The question is what the workflow would be and what should be done. A good thing would IMHO be - mgar package - (Edit some stuff) - mgar repackage-CSWjustone After the individual repackage all packages would be checked together. Checking just one package would IMHO be too dangerous. Additionally, I would remove the target package-CSWfoo as it indicates it could be explicitly called. Building just one package without the others first is also a usecase I would like to avoid. Peter, would this be acceptable? Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
