I started a build on February 25th which ended on 26th:
nohup mgar spotless platforms < /dev/null > ~/logs/texlive 2>&1 &
The resulting packages are in ~/staging/build-25.Feb.2013
Here are the first lines of the content as shown by
ls -1 ~/staging/build-25.Feb.2013
libkpathsea6-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libkpathsea6-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libptexenc1-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libptexenc1-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
pdfjam_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
pdfjam_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tetex_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tetex_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tex_pdftricks_old_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tex_pdftricks_old_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tex_pdftricks_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
tex_pdftricks_stub-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_base-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_base-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_bibtex_extra-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_bibtex_extra-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_binaries-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_binaries-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_common-20120701,REV=2013.02.25-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
texlive_common-20120701,REV=2013.02.26-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz
The sparc specific packages were generated before midnight, the
i386 ones after midnight.
As we can see, all the architecture neutral packages, infix "all",
are duplicated. This is not only a waste of space but also of
time: it means that for each platform they are generated
even though once is enough.
Can this be optimized by generating only once the "all" packages
when using the "platforms" target?
I don't know which is the effect of this on the packages upload
but I'll test it very soon.
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
