Hi everyone, I checked the status of the libssl update (0.9.8 -> 1.0.0) and began to work on updating a lot of these packages so this whole migration is behind us. Here are the remaing packages, sorted by maintainer, that need to be updated before we can complete the migration.
*Alessio Cervellin ( Retired )* nmap <http://www.opencsw.org/p/nmap>: I rebuilt it with it fails under sparc. Following Dago's comment, *I will drop it unless someone objects*. The recipe will still be there if someone wants to work on it. *Andy Igoshin* nginx <http://www.opencsw.org/p/nginx>: Dago, you already updated the recipe. Can you update a release a new package ? *Benny von Mossner ( Sabbatical )* pound <http://www.opencsw.org/p/pound> and pound2<http://www.opencsw.org/p/pound2>: Dago is working on this ones. *Ben Walton* libruby1_9_1_1 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libruby1_9_1_1> and ruby18<http://www.opencsw.org/p/ruby18>: Ben will work soon on updating these packages. *Chad Harp ( Sabbatical ) *gadu <http://www.opencsw.org/p/gadu>: this is a library without reverse dependency. *I will drop it unless someone objects*. *Cyrus Mehta ( Missing ) *monit <http://www.opencsw.org/p/monit>: Jorgen might work on it (Jurgen ?). If not, I will release a package *Dagobert Michelsen* libarchive2 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libarchive2> and libarchive_utils<http://www.opencsw.org/p/libarchive_utils>: Dago takes care of it. libfbopenssl0 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libfbopenssl0>: I rebuilt it but I don't know how to test it. libneon26_feature <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libneon26_feature>: I think this package can be dropped. It doesn't have any real reverse depenency. Dago what do you think ? lynx <http://www.opencsw.org/p/lynx>: I already updated the recipe and tested the package. I can directly upload the package if you want. Are you ok with this Dago ? pm_netssleay <http://www.opencsw.org/p/pm_netssleay>: Dago takes care of it. py_m2crypto <http://www.opencsw.org/p/py_m2crypto>: Dago takes care of it. rdesktop <http://www.opencsw.org/p/rdesktop>: Dago takes care of it. *Darin Perusich* conserver <http://www.opencsw.org/p/conserver>: I rebuilt a package close to the current one. I will mail Darin before uploading it. *Ihsan Dogan* ldnsdrill <http://www.opencsw.org/p/ldnsdrill>: this library doesn't have any reverse dependency. Ihsan, can we drop this one ? unbound_host <http://www.opencsw.org/p/unbound_host>, libunbound2<http://www.opencsw.org/p/libunbound2> and unbound <http://www.opencsw.org/p/unbound>: Ihsan should take care of it *Jake Goerzen:* flphoto <http://www.opencsw.org/p/flphoto> and gftp<http://www.opencsw.org/p/gftp>: Jake, can you update these packages or do you think we can drop them ? *James Lee:* fetchmail <http://www.opencsw.org/p/fetchmail>: I didn't have the time to work on it. Someone interested ? *Jon Craig:* ntop <http://www.opencsw.org/p/ntop>: I updated the recipe but it breaks existing installation because of the gdbm update. Jon, do you intend to work on it ? *Ken Mays ( Retired ) *gimpprint <http://www.opencsw.org/p/gimpprint>: Dago suggested to drop this package, but it means that we drop gimp as well. *I intend to do that as gimp doesn't have any active maintainer*. Any objection ? Only 26 packages remaining ! We can make it ! :) Yann
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
