Laurent Blume <[email protected]> writes: > I've managed to make proper updated packages for otr: > http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gar?view=revision&revision=20976 > > Can someone review them before I push in the catalog?
> 11 DISTFILES = $(NAME)-$(VERSION).tar.gz 11 DISTFILES = $(DISTNAME).tar.gz > 36 BUILD64_LIBS_ONLY = 1 Why not 32 bit also? The obsolescence declaration for CSWotrdevel as being replaced by CSWotr-dev is missing. > The packages themselves should probably be right at this point, but I'm > changing the packages. > > The current status is this: > otr CSWotr 3.2.0,REV=2009.03.30 113.2 KB > otrdevel CSWotrdevel 3.2.0,REV=2009.03.30 20.2 KB > pidginotr CSWpidginotr 3.2.0,REV=2009.02.03 74.7 KB > > What I'm targeting is this: > libotr2 CSWlibotr2 3.2.1 > libotr5 CSWlibotr5 4.0.0 > otr CSWotr 4.0.0 > otr_dev CSWotr-dev 4.0.0 > pidginotr CSWpidginotr 4.0.0 > > With an intermediate step of this: > libotr2 CSWlibotr2 3.2.1 > otr CSWotr 3.2.1 > otrdevel_stub CSWotrdevel 3.2.1 > otr_dev CSWotr-dev 3.2.1 > pidginotr CSWpidginotr 3.2.0 > > > Does it make sense? >From my point of view this is good transition -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
