Laurent Blume <[email protected]> writes: > On 04/07/13 15:58, Peter FELECAN wrote: >> Can you elaborate a bit on "openssl speed"? You agree that we are not >> talking about SS speed but the speed of binaries built with SS, isn't >> it? > > Yup, it's a standard openssl command. Just type "openssl speed", it > gives you a nice bench. I've found it useful to compare raw binary > efficiency and also the effect of different compiler optimization > settings. One interesting thing is that not all algorithms tested get > the same results, so it's a rather comprehensive test. Ie, when I > tested on x86, some algorithms performed better with GCC, others with > Studio, but overall, Studio was superior.
Maybe I misunderstood the issue but openssl is implemented mostly in C and there is no C++. Consequently, the above described benchmark is about code generation when the source is C but we are discussing g++ against SSCC as C++ compilers, wxwidgets being mainly C++. BTW, is wxwidgets in the class of libraries requiring such a great optimization, such as openssl, that it doesn't suffer a little bit of lag on SPARC? -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
