+1. On Jul 23, 2013 9:10 PM, "Laurent Blume" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I'm in favour of dropping. I can't see them as widely used applications, > on any platform, they're niche. If somebody cares enough to pick them up, > they'll be welcome to fix the warnings and maintain. > > Laurent > > On 23/07/2013 18:19, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > >> Hi Jake and others, >> >> I get constant warnings on the old CSWimlib m4 macros and would like to >> know if there >> is still interest in keeping (=updating) it. The only package using it is >> enlightenment which Jake packaged in 2004. I would be willing to fix >> CSWimlib if >> there is interest in updating enlightenment also, otherwise I suggest >> dropping both. >> >> http://www.opencsw.org/**packages/imlib/<http://www.opencsw.org/packages/imlib/> >> >> http://www.opencsw.org/**packages/enlightenment/<http://www.opencsw.org/packages/enlightenment/> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> Best regards >> >> -- Dago >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/**mailman/listinfo/maintainers<https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers> > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
