2013/8/1 Yann Rouillard <[email protected]>: > Ok, maybe we should try to include python 3 in the reflection to be sure it > doesn't bring some new problem. This way we could define a consistent policy > for Python. > > If I understand well, we will prefix all python 3 modules with CSWpy33- our > CSWpy3- ?
I was thinking CSWpy3-. Before we do anything, let's (as always) look closer at what's Debian doing and why. > It seems for python 3, they tried to define a stable ABI / API subset: > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/ My current working assumption is that we will have one module location for all Python 3 minor versions. It's just the question of figuring out a way the module build scripts to put files where we want them. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
