2013/8/2 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >>> BTW, we didn't decided on the delivery of .pyc and .pyo instead of >>> compiling them at installation time. And for this I'm sure that I >>> showed the proof. >> >> I think we've agreed to ship *.pyc in the package, because we will not >> share one .py file across two Python interpreters: we will provide one >> file for the 2.6 interpreter and one file for the 2.7 interpreter. > > I'm not convinced but I concede...
I'm confused. It was your idea, wasn't it? I feel we run in circles, and nobody knows what other others think any more. Let's try to solidify our plan on a wiki page. Here's a starter: http://wiki.opencsw.org/python-module-locations It represents what I'm thinking we could/should do. If there's anything to be expressed in more detail or clarified, just edit the page. I'll watch the edits. If I spot anything that needs more discussion, I'll respond here. > So, in this case, you agree that for 2.x modules the prefix is just > CSWpy- and for 3.x modules is CSWpy3- ? Yes. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
