Rafael Ostertag <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Peter > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:56:20AM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: >> Rafael Ostertag <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hi Peter >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:02:21PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: >> >> FWIW, I ported WebKit to Solaris 10. All the gory details are in the >> >> 21906 revision of the recipe tree >> >> http://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/gar/?rev=21906&view=rev >> > >> > Out of couriosity, didn't you run into trouble due to missing >> > atomicIncrement()/atomicDecrement() on sparc? >> >> This? >> >> #elif COMPILER(GCC) && !CPU(SPARC64) && !OS(SYMBIAN) // sizeof(_Atomic_word) >> != sizeof(int) on sparc64 gcc >> #define WTF_USE_LOCKFREE_THREADSAFEREFCOUNTED 1 >> >> inline int atomicIncrement(int volatile* addend) { return >> __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(addend, 1) + 1; } >> inline int atomicDecrement(int volatile* addend) { return >> __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(addend, -1) - 1; } >> >> in src/3rdparty/webkit/Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/Atomics.h >> > > Yeah, that I meant. Ok, so you are aware of that and that patches would be > available.
>> Please note that we deliver only 32 bit Qt >> >> However, the test is overzealous because gcc 4.8 supplies an >> implementation for sparc v9. We'll see this when we deliver a 64 bit Qt. Having read the above, about what patch are you thinking? Of course, aside removing "&& !CPU(SPARC64)" when the time come. Frankly, for the moment I would concentrate on delivering a complete Qt4 offering and working on Qt5 as the next step. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
