"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/9/24 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >> Alright. But, at least for me, the specifications that you considered >> were opaque. If it's 1Gb of memory and 1 core virtualized then good >> luck; I'm not saying that it is not possible to optimize for that, what >> I'm thinking and say now is that for the moment, documentation wise, we >> should give the current specs of the only working build farm. When the >> optimization lowers the bar, the documentation can be changed. > > OK, makes sense. Unfortunately I don't know the current requirements, > I don't own a spare machine large enough to actually run the current > code. With a lot of RAM (32GB?) it should run in one go, with less RAM > it will run out of memory and you'll have to restart the process a > couple times until it finishes. > > I've listed all the locations to consolidate. All the information is > available already, it's a matter or rewriting the setup howto and > running it to verify that the instructions are actually correct. Is > anyone up for doing that?
As I wrote in the beginning of the summer, I'm voluntary to test/verify the build farm construction documentation. For the time being, I have only an x86 with 8Gb; unfortunately that is the maximum that the mother board supports :-( but the processor is a quad core Xenon. IMHO the writer/consolidator of the documentation should be another person. Do you think that you can do it? -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
