"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/9/26 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >>> In general, we can drop mod_python, it's a thing of the past. >> >> Can you explain? Am I wrong that trac uses mod_python? > > Web apps can have bindings for more than 1 interface. But mod_python > is obsolete for many years now. All python web apps support wsgi now. > Trac does too: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracModWSGI
Thank you. >>> As far as building, can we use alternatives, or create two >>> incompatible packages? >> >> You mean for mod_wsgi? What's your preference? > > Yes, we should build mod_wsgi and drop mod_python entirely. I'm > thinking we could have 1 package for 2.6 mod_wsgi and 1 package for > 2.7 mod_wsgi, the two packages incompatible with each other, since you > can only load one at a time. > > Or use alternatives ‒ whichever options looks better to you. I let the primacy to Dagobert, who's the maintainer, but I have the feeling that he will ask me to do it. Am I wrong? -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
