"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/9/27 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >> If I'm understanding the issue, libmagic provides the conflicting file >> and py_magic use the one provided by libmagic in whatever target >> interpreter. Why do you need an additional modulator for such a thing? > > I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Do we need a modulator > to build a dual 2.6/2.7 package? Yes, we do.
It's your initial affirmation: > Let's use the one from libmagic sources. The caveat is that it will be > fiddly to make it 2.6+2.7 compatible. We'll need an additional > modulator on the Python version. When you affirmed this we already had modulators for different interpreter versions. My question was and is: what additional modulator and why an additional modulator, aside the existing ones. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
