Hi Rafi and slowfranklin, Tell me how to reproduce the problem and I will have a look (for slowfranklin, I suppose I just have to recompile tracker). I am surprised that a patch could have such a bad side effect as screwing the "-z ignore option" and I would prefer to dig first into the problem.
Yann 2013/11/4 Rafael Ostertag <[email protected]> > Hi Dago > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:44:09PM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > Hi Rafi, > > > > > Could it be related to the buildfarm update? > > > > > > Probably, the T5220 is now running 105400-04 whereas unstable10x is > still running 147441-19. > > Should I update the x86 machines also? My impression is to patch as less > as possible to > > not introduce new linker symbol anomalies. The patch on the farm was > needed to fix an ugly > > bug in zfs which prevented us from doing backups, so no option of not > installing ;-) > > If it is related to Solaris patches, patching x86 would mean that `-z > ignore' > might not work on x86 anymore, as well. So, wouldn't it be smarter, to > figure > out why it stopped working on sparc? I mean, -z ignore ain't such an > esotheric > switch and has been put in place for good reasons, hasn't it? > > cheers > rafi >
