Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >> Something is rotten and frankly I don't wish to add overrides as it >> falsifies the dependencies. > > This looks wrong regarding the checks. IMHO when a dependency is given > (regardless > if it is 32 and/or 64 bit) the package should be specified and no surplus > dependency > should be thrown. > > However, I could think of a useful test that the linked libraries between > files of the > same name in different ISA subdirs are the same or must be overridden if not. > Wrong > linkages are a problem when doing 32/64. > > @Maciej, @Yann: What do you think?
What's the wisdom offered by my dear colleagues? Sometime, in the middle term, I'll override the dependencies if there is no other way. Till then I'm devoting myself to other, cleaner, endeavours. -- Peter
