Hi,
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 18:44, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> May I commit my not-yet-working package makefile so yo ucan see it in > >> its entirety? > > > > Yes please :-) > > If it gets hard, maybe it makes sense to build just one version for > starters. You can give packages names with the future dual build in > mind, but only do one build for now. I think it's good to release a > simpler set of packages earlier. Fine, the two packages would be quite similar. Before committing something with the wrong name. Let me understand better and explain. 1) I currently have package "x" (that is gnustep-back) and thus it is named in my opencsw directory 2) one of the modulations needs to be choosen. it is not a feature tha tyou can activate, but a choice that you need to make 3) as package name do you refer to the actual name in the directory? that is, I have gnustep-back, that can be built either "xlib" or "cairo". There is no "gnustep-back" without this choice. All remaining packages will depend on either one or the other, you can't have both. Is it now correct to commit gnustep-back? perhaps with a first hard-configured version to which we make modulations then work? Riccardo
