Hi Peter, Am 04.08.2014 um 10:48 schrieb Peter Bonivart <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hm, this package indeed has no reverse dependencies, but its >> catalogname does not end with _stub, so the script doesn't consider it >> a stub. Maybe we could improve this logic, but I thought we did a good >> job at keeping stubs _stub. How else to tell if a package is a stub? > > Ok, so that's the trigger, maybe that package is too old to get _stub > added from GAR? I know we handled stubs differently before, see > https://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWpmarchivetar/ for example. > > Maybe have multiple triggers, "Transitional package" in description, > "stub" in version? That should catch most of them I think. Yes, that is too old. IMHO we can focus on the new obsoletion with _stub added as no new packages not conforming to the obsoletion rules are pushed. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
