Hi, > Am 05.12.2014 um 08:53 schrieb Jan Holzhueter <[email protected]>: > > Am 05.12.14 um 08:48 schrieb Jan Holzhueter: >> Am 04.12.14 um 20:42 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński: >>> 2014-12-04 19:36 GMT+00:00 Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <[email protected]>: >>>> Affected packages: >>>> - flac (multiple packages) >>>> - libmysqlclient18 >>> >>> I have an idea why this might be: >>> >>> A change in the bundle name for a preexisting package. For example, >>> moving a package from bundle "flac" to bundle "libflac". >>> >>> Probable fix: revert to the old name of bundle, upload. >> >> It would more be it does not have a bundle tag maybe? >> The old flac is from 2011? > > Ok they do have bundel names: > > and they do differ: > > Old: > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/e310640cc16d3413ccb7d3f48a137173/ > > 'OPENCSW_BUNDLE': 'libflac', > > new: > > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/fb36d71dd01c5c3289fbce96d2ffc5b0/ > > OPENCSW_BUNDLE': 'flac' > > but how do you fix that?
The bundle name default to BUNDLE ?= $(NAME) as used in https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk#120 for all packages built by one recipe. We didn’t take much care about bundle names because they were not important in the past. Essentially I think the bundle name should be „flac“ for all packages here. However, I don’t understand why changing bundle names prohibits propagation and therefor is *bad*. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
