Hi Yann, > Am 20.04.2015 um 22:09 schrieb Yann Rouillard <[email protected]>: > > Hi everybody, > > I still don't have enough time work on it but my advice would be to first try > to recompile the openssl sparc package with all upstream Oracle patches > disabled to ensure that check if it is an openssl upstream problem or not. > > Patches to disabled are: openssl-1.0.1m-fork_safe.patch, > openssl-1.0.1m-pkcs11-engine.patch, openssl-1.0.1m-wanboot.patch, > openssl-1.0.1m-t4-engine.sparc.5.11.patch, > openssl-1.0.1e-t4-engine-sparcv9+vis.sparc.5.11.patch. > > I will try to answer questions from whoever can work on this.
I just had a discussion with Laurent about the rebuild: are there any special precautions to be taken or can it just be built by „mgar spotless && mgar platforms“? Best regards — Dago > > Yann > > > 2015-04-20 15:22 GMT+02:00 Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Hi folks, > > I want to raise the issue about OpenSSL 1.0.1m again. On Sparc we have now > two serious issues: > > - BIND fails with crypto failure > https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5237 > <https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5237> > - Solaris 9 applications have issues with hangs in unrelated code. This has > been seen > at least in GIT and Python > > How do we proceed here? While I do notice that it would be good to provide a > working 1.0.1m > the status quo is that bad that I would suggest rolling back to 1.0.1l at > least on Sparc > if the issue can not be resolved in a reasonable timeframe. > > > Best regards > > — Dago > > -- > "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to > do something, > and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 > > -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
