Hi Riccardo, > Am 11.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > while uploading the new packages, I get this problem: > > To see the errors, run: > /home/rmottola/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/bin/../lib/python/checkpkg2.py > --catalog-release unstable --os-release SunOS5.11 --catalog-architecture i386 > c353353fd815aeeef7bfcbfbe9b26d3c b602b1ed6a56070eacaf8f587556d17f > 2576ddf732a227f88b5d03425fa6aebc 82b96ee89206580fcf987793ea98105e > 91b5b03a7a8f907bd6091ccafeff7c75 > > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibpng16-dev += > file-needed-but-no-package-satisfies-it|/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng16.so.16.16.0|CSWlibpng16-dev|contains|symlink|/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng16.so|which|needs|the|target|file:|/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng16.so.16.16.0 > > > I suppose this is a solaris11 problem on the solaris10 package. > Thus it would be: > > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/2576ddf732a227f88b5d03425fa6aebc/ > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/b602b1ed6a56070eacaf8f587556d17f/ > > I see only the standard lib and then amd64 and they both contain > libpng16.so.16.16.0, as expected sicne it is the core of the package. > > What is the matter now? What did change compared to the unversioned package? > Nothing I see of relevance in the receipe, but teach me wrong.
Are you uploading CSWlibpng16-16 together with CSWlibpng16-dev ? You need to upload both at the same time or the database won’t know the destination of the .so symlink. Best regards — DAgo -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
