On 09.12.15 12:47, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Juraj Lutter <[email protected]>:
> > On 12/09/15 12:20, Laurent Blume wrote:
> >> Le 2015/12/09 12:13 +0100, Carsten Grzemba a écrit:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> for SVR4 packages we use a concept to package shared libs, header files
> >>> and manuals in own packages like:
> >>> CSWlibssl1-0-0 CSWlibssl-dev CSWopenssl-utils
> >>> Although there are facets for IPS packages, I would suggest to keep this
> >>> concept also for IPS packages
> >> Agreed. Facets are another needlessly confusing innovation, different
> >> for the sake of difference.
> >
> > I'd preferably go with facets, to be more consistent with IPS concepts.
> > We can disaggree with them but they are here and we could probably avoid
> > problems that may arise in the future.
>
> +1 for facets, the selection can be done automatically by GAR in much the same
> way as it is now with PKGFILES_DEVEL. Same goes for language support.
>
But it is no solution for shared libraries, if there are different versions
needed by different packages.
