Hi Riccardo,

Am 09.12.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> From what I could gather from the internet, this is caused by forcing i386 
>>> because those functions are available only on >= 486 as atomic function.
>>> >If someone can confirm that this is the problem, is it it reasonable to 
>>> >compile for 486 and up only? What's the best way to set march ?
>> I doubt you can run on a CPU which does not support 486 commands, so it is 
>> most certainly ok.
> 
> I doubt that too.
> On the FAQ you suggest removing OPT flags. I would instead rising the ARCH 
> version. How is that best accomplished?
> 
> /opt/csw/bin/gcc-4.6      -m32 -march=i386
> 
> march = i486
> would be more appropriate, but it should happen only during x86 builds, not 
> amd64 so I don't want to force it.

Look here:
  
https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.conf.mk#520

ISA_DEFAULT_i386-5.9 = pentium_pro


Best regards

  — Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to