/   |  _     \ |        | |
                    _o_\_,_;_(_  ,o _\;__,_,_,_; :
                   (    ..      (

Dear gta 

I am sending you a copy of the page I read at 
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/0109inddem.html :
================================================================ 

GAC 0109inddem 
              Fighting Terrorism, Undermining         Democracy in Indonesia      

 By John Gershman      

      

          0109inddem.pdf

            

 An         early beneficiary of the new pre-eminence given by the Bush administration 
        to its war against terrorism could be the Indonesian military, the same        
 military behind the ravaging of East Timor in 1999 and continuing grave         human 
rights abuses in West Papua, Aceh, and elsewhere in the archipelago.         That 
possibility emerged from talks this past week at the White House         between 
Indonesian President Megawati and Bush, whose main goal was to         enlist 
Indonesia, host to the world's largest Muslim population, in the         fight against 
terrorism.      

Indonesian President Megawati Sukarnoputri met this week with President         George 
W. Bush, one of the first heads of state to visit the U.S. since         the terrorist 
attacks on September 11. President Bush had invited Megawati         in late July 
after she assumed office, following the dismissal of Abdurrahman         Wahid.      

The meeting revealed much about how the Bush administration is going         to try to 
consolidate the emerging international coalition against terrorism,         especially 
among developing countries. Indonesia is a critical component         of the effort 
because of its position as the world's most populous Muslim         democracy and the 
growing political role of Islamist organizations within         Indonesia since the 
collapse of the New Order regime in 1998. There are         also allegations that some 
radical Islamist groups in Indonesia are connected         with Osama bin Laden's Al 
Qaeda organization.      

The Bush strategy appears to be a mixture of aid and trade initiatives         
combined with a strengthening of bilateral military-military ties. President         
Bush's economic commitments to Indonesia include: at least $130 million         in 
bilateral assistance for fiscal 2002 (mostly for judicial reform),         $10 million 
for assistance to internally displaced peoples, $5 million         for reconciliation 
and reconstruction efforts in the strife-torn province         of Aceh, $2 million to 
assist in refugee repatriation in West Timor, and         $10 million for police 
training. In addition, the Bush administration         will make available $100 
million in additional benefits under the Generalized         System of Preferences 
(GSP) by enabling 11 additional products to be allowed         duty-free access to the 
U.S. market. Finally, President Bush announced         that the three U.S. trade 
finance agencies--the Export-Import Bank, the         Overseas Private In!
vestment Corporation, and the U.S. Trade and Development         Agency--have 
developed a joint trade and finance initiative to help promote         economic 
development in Indonesia. The three agencies will undertake to         provide up to a 
combined $400 million to promote trade and investment         within Indonesia, 
especially in the Indonesian oil and gas sector.      

The economic initiatives are relatively small, and Indonesia's macroeconomic         
policy remains firmly under the supervision of the International Monetary         
Fund. The emphasis on judicial reform is at least aimed at an important         
target. A recent Survey Report on Citizens' Perceptions Of The Indonesian         
Justice Sector from the Asia Foundation and AC Nielsen 
(http://www.asiafoundation.org/pdf/IndoLaw.pdf)         revealed some unsettling 
findings in a country attemtping to institutionalize         a fragile democracy. More 
than half of the country's adults can't provide         a single example of a right to 
which they are entitled. More than 60%         of respondents said police were apt to 
demand a bribe to take action over         anything, while 30%-35% thought the courts 
were only for the wealthy and         were "risky" places to seek justice. The danger, 
however, is         that efforts to promote the rule of law, judicial reform, and 
respect    !
     for human rights will be undermined by the administration's increasing         
support for and ties with Indonesia's military.      

The major issue on the U.S. agenda for the meeting was the issue of bilateral         
military ties. Recent reports from the Council on Foreign Relations and         the 
Rand Corporation, both issued well before the tragedies of last week,         
advocated that the Bush administration strengthen ties with Indonesia         in 
general and the Indonesian military in particular. The recommendation         was 
aimed at combating the growing influence of radical Islamic groups,         as well as 
providing a means of forging a strong bulwark against China         in the region. The 
Council on Foreign Relations report, The United         States and Southeast Asia: A 
Policy Agenda for the New Administration,         was notable because it was drafted 
by Dov Zakheim, a Reagan-era Pentagon         planner currently serving in the 
Pentagon.      

Indonesian military complicity with the human rights violations associated         
with the widespread carnage in East Timor in the aftermath of its referendum         
on independence in 1999 had led the U.S. Congress to strengthen already         
existing limits on bilateral military ties. The new legislation restricted         
arms sales and military training until a number of criteria were met,         
including increased civilian control over the military, greater transparency         
in military spending, and accountability for military officers complicit         in 
committing human rights violations. The Bush administration's own State         
Department officials acknowledge that the Indonesian military has yet         to meet 
those basic criteria, and in some ways, the situation is worsening.         For 
example, several officers who held command positions in East Timor         in 1999 
have not only not been tried, but have received promotions. There         is also a !
severe problem with transparency of the military's revenues.         Experts estimate 
that only 25-30% of the military's funding comes from         the government budget, 
with the rest coming from "taxes" on         natural resource extraction, bribes, and 
other forms of "informal"         financing. Human rights violations have increased in 
Aceh and West Papua,         regions where secessionist movements are strong.      

Nevertheless, the Bush administration announced yesterday some easing         of 
restrictions on bilateral military ties. While the administration has         not 
requested that Congress lift restrictions on weapons sales and training,         it 
has some discretion in other areas that it has chosen to exercise,         despite the 
continuing evidence of a military able to act with impunity.         Presidents Bush 
and Megawati agreed to:      

        
* expand modest contacts and resume regular meetings between the U.S.           and 
Indonesian militaries to support Indonesia's efforts at military           reform and 
professionalization. Such activities include Indonesian participation           in a 
variety of conferences, multilateral exercises, subject matter           exchanges on 
issues such as military reform, military law, investigations,           budgeting and 
budget transparency, as well as humanitarian assistance           and joint relief 
operations.        
* establish a bilateral Security Dialogue under the supervision of the           two 
countries' respective civilian ministers of defense in order to           promote 
"increased civilian participation in Indonesian defense           and security 
issues."        
* ask Congress for $400,000 to educate Indonesian civilians on defense           
matters through the Expanded International Military Education and Training.        
* lift the embargo on commercial sales of nonlethal defense articles           for 
Indonesia, with individual applications to be reviewed on a case           by case 
basis, in line with standard practice in America.      

      

The common justification for increased engagement is described by the         Rand 
Corporation, which argues that "engagement with the Indonesian         military would 
improve the ability of the United States to promote a democratic         model of 
military professionalism in Indonesia." This claim is clearly         problematic--if 
U.S. engagement with the Indonesian military is so conducive         to 
professionalism, what was the result of three decades of engagement         under 
Suharto's New Order regime? As the International Crisis Group noted         in a July 
2001 report, "the bilateral military relationship has not         been effective to 
date in producing an Indonesian military that meets         the standards of a modern, 
professional force under civilian control or         promoting long-term stability in 
Indonesia."      

Megawati's own human rights record is weak. A staunch nationalist, she         opposed 
the referendum in East Timor that lead to its independence, and         is closely 
allied with the military, bringing four retired military officers         into her 
cabinet. She has taken some initial steps to address the demands         for 
self-determination on the part of inhabitants of Aceh and West Papua.         One of 
the first laws signed by Megawati as president was the Special         Autonomy Law 
for Aceh, while a similar law for West Papua is still being         considered by the 
Indonesian parliament. Both proposals are widely viewed         as inadequate in their 
regions, however, and repression has increased         in those regions since Megawati 
assumed office.      

Prior to September 11 at least, moves toward strengthening U.S.-Indonesian         
military ties were opposed by key Congressional leaders and human rights         
groups because of ongoing human rights violations by the Indonesian military,         
and the continuing impunity of high-ranking Indonesian military officials         for 
their complicity in human rights violations in East Timor and in various         parts 
of Indonesia. The question now is whether the sprit of bipartisanship         that has 
characterized the period since the terrorist attacks will extend         to the Bush 
administration's efforts to strengthen militaries that can         undermine the very 
values of freedom and democracy for which the new war         on terrorism is 
allegedly being waged.      

(John Gershman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         is the co-director of the Global 
Affairs program of the Interhemispheric         Resource center and the Asia/Pacific 
editor for Foreign Policy in Focus.)      

      

      

          

================================================================ 

Sent by: doni - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


................................................................ 
This message was sent from 
http://www.fpif.org/commentary/0109inddem.html  using 
CGI City's Mail-This-Page 
http://icthus.net/CGI-City/ 
................................................................ 

Silakan kunjungi website 'moderator' :-)
di http://abuharits.cjb.net

Kirim email ke