%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: at> At README.W32:26 change namke to nmake
>> OK, fixed this. jg> I wonder if the CVS version is up-to-date with your revisions? (Or jg> maybe savannah is running slow..?) I just pulled the latest code jg> but did not get this fix. It's in my workspace but I haven't committed it yet. jg> This is a patch I submitted nearly 1 year ago. I cannot see it jg> having been reviewed or included in the CVS version. Could jg> someone review it for inclusion please? jg> The revision adds a file which should be present on CVS jg> development versions of the code, to save windows developers jg> having to manually rename a whole bunch of files. I can add this if you like. Are you sure this is all that's needed? There are lots of template files, etc. I guess if you're just trying to build a copy from CVS, this is enough. jg> I think the 2004-02-29 "w32/subproc/NMakefile" change must have jg> been accidentally missed. It was just to add "MAKE = nmake", the jg> same as the applied NMakefile.template patch. This change was committed on 28 Feb 2005. jg> I noticed the compatible compiler and OS versions were out of date jg> in README.W32.template. OK, I've updated this info in my workspace. jg> This patch I submitted nearly 1 year ago has not yet been reviewed jg> (or included in CVS). Could you (or one of the other developers) jg> review it for inclusion in the up-and-coming release please. I jg> created this patch because you said you were agreed to have a jg> higher warning level. I updated the warning level in my workspace as shown in this patch. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
