"Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ... > > Hi all; > > I've applied Eli's two patches, as described here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/make-w32%40gnu.org/msg00634.html > > and here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/make-w32%40gnu.org/msg00697.html > > I also applied (most of) the two patches from Markus on Savannah for the > README.W32 and README.cvs files. > > The fix we had for g->changed was actually broken and caused many of the > regression tests to fail, so I fixed it.
So my latest suggestion from Jan 21st actually was correct :-) "Markus Mauhart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To stay on the safe side IMHO we better map the old "+=" into logical "||=": > > + g->changed = g->changed || (commands_started > ocommands_started); > I also went back into the archives and found the patch Eli sent for st > being used without being initialized in dir.c. > > This is all committed to CVS as of a few minutes ago. > > > Please take a look and see where we are now I just updated my CVS; (autoreconf & configure & make update & make dist) inside cygwin. Take this distribution and {configure & make} {inside cygwin and inside msys+mingw}. Take the msys+mingw-executable and use it inside cmd.exe for some test builds: "no j", "j nothing|2|3|64|345", often 50-60 compilers running on 2 cpu core's. -> Everything ok (as usual "j number" needs some "trick" to tunnel through my makefile's single level of recursion; and my makefile sometimes shows a mkdir-racecondition under high concurrency, to be fixed ...). In the end, without patches I get factor 2 where I want it :-) > I got really lost and > confused after a while with the different threads and discussions and > patches and stuff. Markus; it would be helpful to me if you used the > standard diff -u to generate patches and attached them to your emails Ok. I will take another look into the numerous versions and pieces, and if necessary submit such diff -u. > rather than putting up tarballs somewhere else (BTW, I wasn't able to > access the links you provided in your emails recently for some reason). One link contained a typo: wrong: http://members.chello.at/ejg8dk49/themake-2006.02.22.zip right: same......................................2006.01.22.... I'll check it from some other client pc too. Best Regards, Markus. _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
