> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:37:56 -0600 > From: Matt England <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Matthew England <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[email protected], > [email protected] > > >Sorry, I looked at your transcript, and I cannot make heads or tails > >out of it. Can you explain how do you see that ``jobs are run > >asynchronously in the background after an error'', and then show in > >the transcript the evidence of this asynchronous operation? > > If I could do that easily, I would. I tried massively to do that in the > last output. I'm sorry I won't be able to help further.
How about sending the full output of "make -d"? > First answer: Most of my rules are single-command-line rules. The one > previously was an anomaly; further, when I turned it into the single-line > rule, the same problem happened. I'll show that further in a later email. Well, please show us such rule with that problem. We need to see the details, and preferably some way to reproduce it with a relatively simple example Makefile. Or at least the full output of "make -d", if none of the above is possible. Please help us help you. _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
