> Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:23:13 -0400 > From: Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > IMO, make should not consider d:foo as a valid path even though the OS > does.
You mean in $abspath or everywhere? We were talking about the former; I'm not sure the latter is even practical. Anyway, please tell why you think so. If it's a good reason, it could simplify the code of abspath quite a bit. Also, if Make considers d:foo invalid, what should it do if it does meet it? That is, what are the practical expression of rejecting such file names? > But in reference to your question, I don't find _abspath or > abspath documented and msdn.microsoft.com. I asked about what it did on OS/2. I know that MS-Windows doesn't have it. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
