Brian Dessent wrote: > > This wouldn't happen to be a FAT filesystem would it? Timestamp > granularity on FAT is only 2 seconds, and it looks like the operating > system rounds up. This is but one reason why you should consider > sticking to NTFS. >
Bingo! I am using FAT32. Now that I understand this limitation, I can at least explain it to my grumbling colleagues. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clock-Skew-problem-under-Windows-tp17676587p17678008.html Sent from the Gnu - Make - W32 mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
