Hallo B.,
Am Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2002 um 16:01 schriebst du:
> The newest MM_Cygwin.pm (from ExtUtils::MakeMaker v.6.03) fails to pass
> the cygwin-specific tests for me. The results are below. Given how the
> discussion has gone, isn't this as bad test, not a bad build? It looks
> like the what it got is right, what is was looking for is wrong.
> So, I installed anyway like a brave trooper, make install UNINST=1. I
> next try to build a binary module, say DBI for concreteness. It works!
> The build links correctly now; all tests pass as expected. Excellent.
[...]
> t/MM_Cygwin.............# Failed test (t/MM_Cygwin.t at line 111)
> # got: '$(PERL_INC)/libperl5_6_1.a'
> # expected: '$(PERL_INC)/libperl5_6_1.dll.a'
> # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 13.
> t/MM_Cygwin.............dubious
> Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> DIED. FAILED test 13
> Failed 1/13 tests, 92.31% okay (less 2 skipped tests: 10 okay, 76.92%)
Yes of course, the test wasn't patched, may still be wrong. However,
it should work well with the patched MakeMaker.
Gerrit
--
"All faults& bugs are mine - Robert"
from squid/acinclude.m4, Sun Apr 21 05:21:21 2002
