Good eye.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 10:54:47PM +0200, Slaven Rezic wrote:
> #### Patch data follows ####
> diff -up 'ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.10_06/lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'
> 'new.ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.10_06/lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm'
> Index: ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm
> --- ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm Thu Jun 5 08:19:20 2003
> +++ ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm Sat Jun 21 22:47:20 2003
> @@ -2931,7 +2931,7 @@ $(OBJECT) : $(FIRST_MAKEFILE)
> ' if $self->{OBJECT};
>
> push @m, q{
> -# We take a very conservative approach here, but it\'s worth it.
> +# We take a very conservative approach here, but it's worth it.
> # We move Makefile to Makefile.old here to avoid gnu make looping.
> $(FIRST_MAKEFILE) : Makefile.PL $(CONFIGDEP)
> $(NOECHO) $(ECHO) "Makefile out-of-date with respect to $?"
> diff -up 'ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.10_06/lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm'
> 'new.ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.10_06/lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm'
> Index: ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm
> --- ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm Wed May 28 23:41:22 2003
> +++ ./lib/ExtUtils/MM_VMS.pm Sat Jun 21 22:47:46 2003
> @@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ $(OBJECT) : $(FIRST_MAKEFILE)
> ] if $self->{OBJECT};
>
> push @m,q[
> -# We take a very conservative approach here, but it\'s worth it.
> +# We take a very conservative approach here, but it's worth it.
> # We move $(FIRST_MAKEFILE) to $(MAKEFILE_OLD) here to avoid gnu make looping.
> $(FIRST_MAKEFILE) : Makefile.PL $(CONFIGDEP)
> $(NOECHO) $(ECHO) "$(FIRST_MAKEFILE) out-of-date with respect to
> $(MMS$SOURCE_LIST)"
> #### End of Patch data ####
>
> --
> Slaven Rezic - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Berlin Perl Mongers - http://berliner.pm.org
--
Hey you kids, come back here! I know who your parents are! You wouldn't
do this if Nixon was in the White House! Come on, I'm the Walrus, damnit!
