Odd that you say you missed it since in the messages you sent recently:

http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-09/msg00675.html

you said:

 > Looks ok to me.

Which was in reference to the message in:

http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-09/msg00608.html

Is it it clear which patch I was referring to now?

Peter Prymmer

Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/11/2003 05:11:57 PM:

> Patch for the miniperl in path problem?  I must have missed it.

Reply via email to