On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, demerphq <demer...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/2/27 Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com>:
>> The plan changed in the middle of this argument and I think that wast lost. >> I >> no longer plan to do it with make subtests but rather by hacking t/TEST and >> t/harness. It should work out to no visible change. Rather than untangle >> the >> miscommunication in email its simpler and faster for me to just do it and let >> the code speak for itself. > > That sounds great! Yes, indeed. Even if the hacks are wicked they'll be corralled into one or two places where we can keep an eye on them.
