From: Charles Richmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/28/science/28BELL.html
A Sudden Host of Questions on Bell Labs Breakthroughs
By KENNETH CHANG

On a ski slope in Utah in March, Paul Grant and Rick Greene made a bet  
about superconductors.

Dr. Grant and Dr. Greene, who had been longtime colleagues at the I.B.M. 
Almaden Research Center in San Jose, Calif., had debated all day a 
sensational scientific report that molecules of carbon shaped like soccer 
balls had been turned into superconductors  materials that carry 
electricity with virtually no resistance  at surprisingly warm 
temperatures.

Dr. Grant doubts the findings. Dr. Greene said he thought that they they 
would be verified.

Last week, Dr. Grant sent an e-mail message reminding Dr. Greene of the 
wager, because the lead researcher of the experiment was Dr. J. Hendrik 
Schön, the Bell Labs scientist who is now the center of a scientific 
misconduct investigation. Nearly identical graphs appear in several of Dr. 
Schön's scientific papers, even though the graphs represent different data 
from different experiments. Bell Labs, part of Lucent Technologies, has 
convened an independent panel to investigate.

But even before the two main papers cited in the investigation were 
published, a debate had arisen over the superconductor claims.

"There's been a lot of buzz for well over a year," said Dr. Grant, now a 
science fellow at the Electric Power Research Institute in Palo Alto, 
Calif.

Dr. Schön and his collaborators have developed a revolutionary technique 
that allows them to explore systematically the electronic properties of 
various materials. Dr. Grant had called the team's "buckyball" work paper 
"a tour de force of physics" when it was announced. Other scientists said 
it might be worthy of a Nobel Prize.

The superconductor work is not among the seven papers that include the 
suspect graphs, which report advances in organic transistors and molecular 
electronics. But the investigation casts a pall over all of Dr. Schön's 
research. He has been an author on more than 70 scientific papers in the 
last two and a half years  a remarkably prodigious output  and some people 
wonder whether there might be undiscovered problems with other papers.

"That has to be the question on everybody's minds," said Dr. Arthur 
Hebard, a professor of physics at the University of Florida and a former 
Bell Labs scientist. "I have more skepticism about the data."

Dr. Schön's collaborators on the superconductor work  Dr. Christian Kloc, 
a chemist at Bell Labs, and Dr. Bertram Batlogg, ex-director of solid 
state physics research at Bell Labs and now a professor of physics at the 
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich  are also co-authors of 
several of the questioned papers. Some researchers are increasingly 
disturbed that no one has reproduced the superconducting results since 
they were reported a year and a half ago.

"Good stuff will repeat itself in other laboratories," Dr. Hebard said.

Dr. Schön has declined to comment on the questions about his work other 
than that he stands by his results and that he will cooperate with the 
panel. Dr. Kloc also declined to comment, and efforts to reach Dr. Batlogg 
have been unsuccessful.

Bell Labs officials have said that the panel will investigate those 
questions and that Lucent will act on its recommendations.

Dr. Hebard was on a Bell Labs team that discovered in 1991 that 
buckyballs, molecules made of 60 carbon atoms arrayed in the shape of a 
soccer ball, could be turned into superconductors when mixed with 
potassium, a process that adds electrons to carry the electrical current. 
Buckyballs are named after R. Buckminster Fuller, designer of the geodesic 
dome that they resemble.

But the buckyballs switched back into insulators at temperatures above 
minus 427 degrees Fahrenheit. Other researchers verified that work. But 
because so-called high-temperature superconductors work at considerably 
warmer temperatures, most researchers in the field soon lost interest.

The new team at Bell Labs, Drs. Schön, Kloc and Batlogg, took a radically 
different approach to making buckyball superconductors. In Nature on Nov. 
30, 2000, the researchers reported that they had essentially built a 
transistor out of buckyballs. They placed a layer of aluminum oxide on top 
a neatly stacked crystal of buckyballs and then gold electrodes on the 
aluminum oxide.

The electrodes, the team reported, generated an electric field strong 
enough to yank an average of three electrons away from each buckyball. The 
"holes" left behind by the missing electrons were then able to condense 
into a superconducting current. The electron-depleted buckyballs were 
superconducting up to a temperature of minus 366 degrees, the scientists 
said.

In the paper, they also wrote that calculations indicated that if the 
buckyballs could be moved farther apart from one another, the 
superconducting temperature could be pushed up even more.

A year later, they reported in Science that they had achieved just that. 
By wedging bromoform, a molecule containing bromine, between the 
buckyballs, the team said it had raised the superconducting temperature to 
minus 249 degrees, warmer than most high-temperature superconductors.

But scientists who tried to reproduce the experiment have been stymied at 
the first step of the first experiment, making the layer of aluminum 
oxide, which acts as an insulator to prevent electric charge on the gold 
electrodes from arcing across to the buckyballs.

Because buckyballs hold their electrons tightly, pulling off one electron 
requires a strong electric field. Pulling three off requires a very strong 
electric field. But for everyone else, the oxide layer failed at electric 
fields far weaker than those reported in the Bell Labs papers.

"We're off almost by a factor of 10," Dr. Hebard said, adding that it was 
possible that the Bell Labs researchers used special techniques not yet 
discovered by others.

"If it's correct," Dr. Hebard said, "it's a wonderful challenge. If it's 
not correct, it's very troubling."

Dr. Arthur P. Ramirez, a scientist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory 
who was on the 1991 team that discovered buckyball superconductivity, said 
he believed that the researchers had achieved what they claimed  
superconducting buckyballs at minus 249 degrees. "It seems to hold 
together with previous work we did," he said.

Dr. Ramirez has also come closest to reproducing the work.

Using buckyball crystals provided by Dr. Kloc, Dr. Ramirez has produced 
transistors with aluminum oxide layers that withstand electric fields 
three times as strong as Dr. Hebard's, although it still needs to be three 
times as great as it is now to achieve superconductivity.

"It requires a combination of different expertises that is not commonly 
found in one place," Dr. Ramirez said. "We've been working on this for 
half a year, and it's pretty difficult."

The field of superconductivity is littered with remarkable claims that 
never reappeared in other laboratories. "When there's a real event, it 
reproduced relatively quickly," said Dr. Greene.

Even though the buckyball experiment has not been reproduced, Dr. Greene, 
director of the Center for Superconductivity at the University of 
Maryland, took the side of the Bell Labs researchers in his bet with Dr. 
Grant because of the credibility of Dr. Batlogg, a well-respected 
researcher in the field.

"On the other hand," Dr. Greene said, "there are some competent groups 
that have been working on this. I'm a little surprised it hasn't been 
reproduced."

Dr. Grant said the Bell Labs researchers should have gone out of their way 
to have someone else reproduce the experiment. "You want the greatest 
credibility you can gather," he said.

After protecting any potential commercial applications with patent 
applications, the researchers should have invited other scientists into 
their laboratory and provided a hands-on demonstration or gone to another 
lab and reproduced the experiment there, Dr. Grant said.

Although the first task of the investigating panel, headed by Dr. Malcolm 
Beasley, a professor of applied physics at Stanford, is to examine the 
issues raised so far, it has free rein to look at other areas of Dr. 
Schön's research, including the buckyball superconductors.

-- 
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body
"unsubscribe man-bytes-dog" (the subject is ignored).]

Reply via email to