Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com<mailto:kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com>
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange
will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following
diagnostic text to your system administrator.
________________________________
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: cb.intra.lutron.com
kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##
Original message headers:
Received: from p02c12m111.mxlogic.net (208.65.145.245) by
ls186.cb.intra.lutron.com (8.14.172.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
8.3.137.0; Mon, 16 May 2011 10:27:51 -0400
Received: from unknown [209.190.47.10] (EHLO spammotel.com) by
p02c12m111.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.10.0-1) with ESMTP id
a7431dd4.0.1039542.00-2287.1278152.p02c12m111.mxlogic.net (envelope-from
<re.vuqc6mlugx...@spammotel.com>); Mon, 16 May 2011 08:28:10 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by spammotel.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id E4F0A6DC2A2; Mon, 16
May 2011 09:31:22 -0400 (EDT)
Old-Return-Path: <mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net>
X-Original-To: kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com
Delivered-To: spammotel+KBQLKJGXLFMZ@localhost
Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88])
by spammotel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35E66DDA75 for
<kbqlkjgxl...@spammotel.com>; Mon, 16 May 2011 09:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from
<mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net>) id 1QLxqe-0008Ua-LB; Mon, 16
May 2011 13:28:36 +0000
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com
with esmtp (Exim
4.76) (envelope-from <jonathan.hardcas...@gmail.com>) id 1QLxqd-0008UU-HI
for
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 May 2011 13:28:35 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.47;
envelope-from=jonathan.hardcas...@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qw0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by
sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim
4.76)
id 1QLxqc-0000K6-KU for mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 16 May
2011
13:28:35 +0000
Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so3115925qwh.34 for
<mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 16 May 2011 06:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.114.77 with SMTP id d13mr3269423qcq.219.1305552509205;
Mon, 16 May 2011 06:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.26.134 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 06:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon Hardcastle <j...@ehardcastle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:28:09 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SmChMnn_0ddn0-IQHt3GNLrO-Ko
Message-ID: <BANLkTing=pb2rajyhvg5nyjmg1cpdot...@mail.gmail.com>
To: <mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail
(jonathan.hardcastle[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 RFC_ABUSE_POST Both abuse and postmaster missing on sender domain
0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Headers-End: 1QLxqc-0000K6-KU
Old-Subject: [mantisbt-help] Category becomes Category_id?
X-BeenThere: mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Old-Reply-To: Help with Mantis <mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: Help with Mantis <mantisbt-help.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help>,
<mailto:mantisbt-help-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=mantisbt-help>
List-Post: <mailto:mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:mantisbt-help-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help>,
<mailto:mantisbt-help-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===============5398204741862770621=="
Errors-To: mantisbt-help-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: **MBT: [mantisbt-help] Category becomes Category_id?
Reply-To: <re.vuqc6mlugx...@spammotel.com>
X-Spam: [F=0.2727272727; B=0.500(0); STSI=0.500(-12); STSM=0.600(22); CM=0.500;
MH=0.500(2011051613); S=0.200(2010122901); SC=none]
X-MAIL-FROM: <re.vuqc6mlugx...@spammotel.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [209.190.47.10]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=0BAIJnUQijIA:10 a=D-oQZgGZFS0A:10 a=Y2ClkDGDOA]
X-AnalysisOut: [wA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=m07EnBT+tZ6AK6]
X-AnalysisOut: [iSG7TWoA==:17 a=AbZCDtEPAAAA:8 a=rgWzqNy58Il2tHi_7dEA:9 a=]
X-AnalysisOut: [xHjm71fnTPA3ev3TzksA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=8L_BRCrAI2QA:10]
X-AnalysisOut: [ a=dktTq5uXAAAA:8 a=FP58Ms26AAAA:8 a=gOoThlQepmX16liIyVoA:]
X-AnalysisOut: [9 a=eWvHzOxEkvNc1guoKmoA:7 a=52dZ-evEQ9kA:10 a=2z1OXlWFAAA]
X-AnalysisOut: [A:8 a=xF4Tdw3-91zPDLZltR4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=TjdTsdntB]
X-AnalysisOut: [Rec40u70TIA:9]
Return-Path: re.vuqc6mlugx...@spammotel.com
Reporting-MTA: dns;cb.intra.lutron.com
Received-From-MTA: dns;p02c12m111.mxlogic.net
Arrival-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:27:51 +0000
Final-Recipient: rfc822;KBQLKJGXLFMZ@spammotel.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
We have just upgraded from Mantis 1.1.7 to MantisBT 1.2.4
and some users have noticed that 'category' no longer appears on any of the
reports (we have quite alot of tailored reports)
I dug around in the code and config files and found something called
'category_id'
Does anyone know if these are one and the same? and if so why it changed
names?
Is there anyway to bulk change all of our references?
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help
--- End Message ---
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
mantisbt-help mailing list
mantisbt-help@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-help
