In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Wilson-Okamura <david@virgil.org> writes
Commentators in the Renaissance routinely explain the proper name "Dis" as dis 'wealthy'. Cf. "Plouton" from "Ploutos" in Plato, Crat. 403a. I have two questions about this.

1. Is the Dis etymology valid?
Ernout-Meillet accept it; and I don't know of an alternative.
2. How old is it?
At least as old as Cicero (De natura deorum 2. 66), though Quintilian (1. 6. 34) took it to operate by contraries (quia minime dives).

Leofranc Holford-Strevens

--
*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*

Leofranc Holford-Strevens
67 St Bernard's Road                                         usque adeone
Oxford               scire MEVM nihil est, nisi ME scire hoc sciat alter?
OX2 6EJ

tel. +44 (0)1865 552808(home)/353865(work)          fax +44 (0)1865 512237
email:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)

*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To leave the Mantovano mailing list at any time, do NOT hit reply.
Instead, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
"unsubscribe mantovano" in the body (omitting the quotation marks). You
can also unsubscribe at http://virgil.org/mantovano/mantovano.htm#unsub

Reply via email to