I really don't like how the map objects and the wms objects relate to
each other.
The global JavaScript variable "wms" is an array of WMS objects. The
variable "map" is an array of map objects. Each map object has an
additional "wms" array and these entries point to the WMS within global
variable "wms".
This means that you have at least one WMS in two or more map objects, so
manipulating it in a single map also alters it in the other. I assume
removing the global WMS object and storing the data in each map object
would be more consistent.
Please enlighten me if you have an explanation why the current solution
is superior.
Christoph
--
_______________________________________
W h e r e G r o u p GmbH & Co. KG
Siemensstraße 8
53121 Bonn
Germany
Christoph Baudson
Anwendungsentwickler
Fon: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 15
Fax: +49 (0)228 / 90 90 38 - 11
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wheregroup.com
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6788
_______________________________________
Komplementärin:
WhereGroup Verwaltungs GmbH
vertreten durch:
Arnulf Christl, Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Mapbender_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapbender_dev
