Hey, I picked this up on the OGC lists. Maybe someone is interested in implementing this, there might be some funding in the upcoming OGC WOS-6 testbed. I know we have also been doing some things in this respect so maybe its not that big an effort.
Best regards, Arnulf. ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [Context.RWG] 1.0 at the next TC? From: "Cameron Shorter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, August 18, 2008 23:07 To: "Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raj, With Mapbuilder we had not completely upgraded to the 0.3.0 spec - we still had some inconsistencies. However I did quite an extensive review of the spec when I was trying to work out what was required to upgrade to 0.3.0, and I was satisfied that the spec has become quite mature and is close to ready to be moved to 1.0. I'd suggest that before we move to 1.0, we should use the latest context spec in a testbed and ensure that there are a few clients which support it. I understand that it wouldn't take much to bring UDig to support the latest version of Context, Mapbuilder almost supports it, (but we have recently retired mapbuilder, recommending people use Openlayers instead). Openlayers still needs some work to support all the Context layers, but this is quite achievable in the timeframe of a testbed. Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote: > Raj: I would support this. Having an encoding to be able to point to multiple OWS types would be useful in clients. As well, the KML integration makes it all that more appealing! We might also want to have examples using using OWS Context within a KML document (i.e. in kml:ExtendedData). > > Having said this, I will test the examples at http://www.ogcnetwork.net/schemas/owc/0.3.0 > > What do others think? > > ..Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Raj Singh > Sent: Wed 13-Aug-08 20:12 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Context.RWG] 1.0 at the next TC? > > OWC 0.3.0 has been out there since early May at: > http://www.ogcnetwork.net/schemas/owc/0.3.0/ > > 1. Has anyone tested it? > 2. If so, is it ready to move forward towards 1.0? > > --- > Raj > > > _______________________________________________ > Context.rwg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg > > > _______________________________________________ > Context.rwg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg > -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Systems Architect Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Commercial Support for Geospatial Open Source Solutions http://www.lisasoft.com/LISAsoft/SupportedProducts.html _______________________________________________ Context.rwg mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg -- Arnulf Christl http://www.wheregroup.com _______________________________________________ Mapbender_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapbender_dev
