On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:38, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]>wrote:
> Chris Browet wrote: > >> On a side note, Richard being the creator of MapCSS (AFAIK), I tend to >> consider Potlach 2 as the reference implementation unless proved wrong. >> OTOH, it may be that potlach.css is not a proper base. If so, please >> tell me... >> > > Potlatch 2 has what you might call a proto-MapCSS. Because I've been > working on other aspects of Potlatch 2 over the past couple of months, I've > not been able to give MapCSS the time and attention it needs, so P2's > parser/renderer hasn't evolved as much as I'd like. > > So the idea behind this mailing list is to arrive at a better 0.2 by > consensus. :) I wouldn't assume that Potlatch 2 is a reference > implementation as yet. > Okay. Back to my original questions. Who's "right" so far, the wiki page, Kothic, P2, ... ? Will you at some point align P2 to the wiki or Kothic or...? IMHO, the wiki should hold the (current) truth, whatever discussions on the list/elsewhere... OTOH, unless mistaken, Kothic is the only working implementation so far (is it aligned with the current spec?)... - Chris -
_______________________________________________ Mapcss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/mapcss
